Driving Pressure During Mechanical Ventilation of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Abstract

Background: Driving pressure has been identified as a more accurate indicator of mortality risk than low tidal volume (VT) and pulmonary compliance (Ppl). It was also noted that when this pressure surpasses the 18 cm H₂O mark, there is a significant elevation in the relative risk of death. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of driving pressure guided ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).   

Patients and Methods: The study included 64 subjects selected from the respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) of Al-Azhar University Hospital (Damietta). All participants received management through a protective lung strategy that was informed by driving Pressure. The study outcomes included 1). Determination of weaning categories; 2). Adverse events; 3). Length of ICU stay and duration of mechanical ventilation; 4). Mechanical Ventilation-free days, and 5). Organ/s dysfunction.

Results: The commonest cause of admission was pneumonia (36%), and least percentage was septic shock (1.6%). The median ICU stay was 7 days (4 to 25 days) and weaning success rate was 76.6% with mortality rate of 23.4%. The severity was mainly severe (40.6%) and moderate (31.2%). Driving pressure at day 1 of ≤ 21 had sensitivity of 97.96%, specificity of 80.0% and area under curve (AUC) of 0.952. The driving pressure was significantly increased in cases with failure weaning than the success weaning (24.67 ± 1.05 vs 16.86 ± 1.24, respectively). In addition, it was significantly increased in died than alive patients. There was progressive significant increase of driving pressure from mild to moderate to severe cases. Pneumothorax was recorded among 9.4% and pleural effusion was recorded for 7.8% of patients.  

Conclusion: Use of driving pressure guided ventilation in patients with ARDS improves lung compliance, decreases the duration of mechanical ventilation and the length of ICU stay. Driving pressure < 21 can predict mortality.